Shared dashboards, mixed tenants
Without tenant-scoped ingest and views, operators cannot trust fleet situation awareness. Control plane boundaries are first-class.
Product agents run per customer tenant. One Behaviour Runtime Intelligence control plane — isolation without operational silos.
For B2B SaaS, agents are often features of your product. PUVINoise treats tenant boundaries as a design constraint — scoped signals, fleet visibility for your operators, and recovery that does not leak blast radius across customers.
Without tenant-scoped ingest and views, operators cannot trust fleet situation awareness. Control plane boundaries are first-class.
Behaviour intelligence surfaces anomalies per tenant and across the fleet so you intervene before support volume spikes.
Uptime alone hides retry storms and silent policy gaps. Recovery intelligence ties MTTR to originating behaviour signals.
Confirm tenant.id and service.name on instrumented runs. Verify Command Centre filters before promoting to production customers.
Platform operators vs customer-facing responders. Align access patterns with Security narratives and your own RBAC.
Treat per-tenant agent failures as production cases. Expand instrumentation after first successful ingest and policy review.
Yes — multi-tenancy is how enterprises and SaaS platforms onboard fleets without shared blast radius. Exact tenancy topology is designed with your architecture during evaluation.
Typically no. A shared control plane with tenant-scoped data paths is the default enterprise pattern. Details belong in architecture review, not a one-line marketing claim.
Keep your APM and logs. PUVINoise adds behaviour runtime intelligence — sessions, decisions, policy, and recovery — purpose-built for agent fleets.
Read Product architecture, the B2B SaaS solutions hub, Developers for SDK setup, and request a demo with industry=b2b-saas.
Walk tenant-scoped signals, Command Centre, and recovery with a SaaS platform lens.